![]() I don't know how to convey that I don't work for Harrison other than to say: trust me. It dawned on me about halfway through typing my post that I would be accused of this. I realize that reps from companies lurk in forums like these just waiting for someone to dis (do the kids still say dis?) their product so they can drop in some official talking points to balance out opinion. Maybe I should try to use some more cool advertising words like: Harrison MixBus' realish analog mixer looking knobs are the delicious and refreshing way to loose weight. I know I should really get into advertising. Yeah, thats the best sales pitch I've EVER HEARD. I don't want your tracks sounding as good as mine. I strongly encourage everyone to give MixBus a try.actually, I take that back. The pedigree behind Record (audio toy manufacturer) is also apparent, in a bad way. I realize why everyone wants to compare this program to the PropellerHeads proggy, but from my (limited) tests I can tell you that there is no comparison. ![]() I believe this will make it the first program to do this without the use of plugins. It also has latency compensation for external effects units. Version 1.1 of MixBus, which is still in testing, has full latency compensation throughout. So when you move beyond the built in busses and have to use Ardour's busses you don't get that feature. Ardour (the program that MixBus is built on) doesn't have latency compensation. There is full latency compensation on the Harrison mixer busses. The person who did that test screwed something up. Noone (myself included) has been able to reproduce the NULLing mixes from any app with mixbus. Slamthecrank gave the highlights of the early stages of a thread on GearSlutz (the thread is now at 35 pages and the skeptics are dying off there). Does it sound as good as an analog Harrison console? NO. I don't know about having a real console in the box, but what ever is in there sounds great. You wouldn't believe how much this can speed up a mix.Īs far as the marketing goes, like with all products, you have to separate the language from the fact. This is a far more intuitive approach than having to open EQ and compression in separate windows. I love having the EQ and dynamics easily available in the mixer window. With the two projects that I've moved from logic to mixbus, I was able to get a nicer sounding mix in much less time with fewer plugins. The mixes I've done on it sound much better than I can get out of logic. This is a fantastic sounding piece of software. I read what you guys were saying and thought I would balance the opinions on this thread out a little (so there you go.full transparency). I found this thread doing a quick google search on Harrison Mixbus. However, I have respect to them also since they managed to find something they can go to.Hi guys. I really feel sorry for people who are going to use it as a go to thing. This plugin will make people not knowing what they are doing while the plugin is not doing something special but it is such present with their own plugin which already exists in their fingertips. Why not put every single of them and check what works. ![]() UAD already offers Cambridge EQ why not using that for your liking? There are amazing comps from UAD. Why don't people add SSL comp or Fairchild on the master bus or whatever they chose and control them for themselves? They learn on their way. It boost low and high so immediately you will be tricked. That is what is happening when you instert the plugin. Why? why would I do that? to protect myself from over EQ ing cause since it is going to be already over boosted with Mixdown. They say CLA advised to mix while the plugin is on. 2, it will make musician lazy and stop them from learning. I tried this tool and like I have said it in gearslutz I will say it here and I didn't like it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |