![]() It's not a performance tyre but if you drive normal and not like a fool or something, you have always a safe feeling, even when it rains hard and much aquaplanning on the road, always a safe feeling and a lot of feedback what you doing. ![]() I can't say anything about wear but i have much confidence in Energy Saver+Īlso good dry and wet grip. The previous tyres (normal energy savers) the steering becomes a bit heavy, but now it's easy to steer to right or left. The day i put them on my car, the first corner i thought damn, these tyres are excellent when driving, steeringwheel is much easyer and lighter. Cause i drive 40.000km in one year, it save's fuel and also money. My english is nog as good as some people espect, but i do my best.Īt first i want a performance tyre cause i drive sportive, my car is a Alfa Romeo 147 140hp JTD, but a few days later i realize i want tyres where ecofuelly. I have these tyres, the Energy Saver + for 4.000km and before i have the same tires, but then the normal version of it. Don't forget a tyres rolling resistance improves with wear, and double check your tyre pressures as a few PSI can make a difference too. There's a chance they will be, yes, but different car and tyre combinations can work differently. The fact that these Michelin are rated C will they be worse in fuel efficiency compared to my B rated t005's? I have bridgestone t005's and their fuel efficiency is poor compared to the toyo nano energy i had before. The energy saver plus are tires aimed for excellent fuel efficiency but their fuel efficiency rating is C!?! We don't have an exact weight for the Michelin Energy Saver+ on record, but it should weigh around 8kgs. Michelin Energy Saver Plus,205/55/16,tyre weight? The Energy Saver+ will still have the rolling resistance advantage in certain sizes, but the difference will be small. The CrossClimate is reported to have slightly better wear than the Energy Saver+, and much improved wet grip. From what i have read if I could get similar life out of the latter, that would be the best choice but I am concerned that I will get less life from the Cross Climate. After nearly 2 years of use totalling 38,000 miles and getting an average 62.5 mpg from my Honda Civic Tourer, I am sticking with Michelin but cannot decide between the Michelin Energy Saver Plus and the fairly new Michelin Cross Climate. I am about to change my tyres and have been very pleased with my Michelin Energy Savers. It's not unusual for the tread pattern of tyres to alter slightly as the tyre width increases, with a lot of manufacturers putting in an extra circumferential rib to their larger sizes. I've noticed that these tyres come in 2 different tread paterns with the same name, according to their size. Questions and Answers for the Michelin Energy Saver Plus
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |